Proposed common issue (d) raises the possibility that an aggregate assessment of damages might be made. This is essentially a question for the trial judge but is often discussed at the certification stage and is sometimes included as a common issue because of the bearing it may have on the preferability, and manageability, of the procedure under the CPA. On this issue, I am in agreement with the submission of counsel for the plaintiffs that the case is indistinguishable from Cloud – in which the possibility of an aggregate assessment was included as a common issue - and distinguishable from Bywater v. Toronto Transit Commission, [1998] O.J. No. 4913 (G.D.) on which defendant's counsel relied.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.