What is Collicutt’s claim in the Statement of Claim?

Collicutt argues that the Statement of Claim is deficient on the basis that paras. 7-10 inclusive contain only bare allegations, that there is no reasonable cause of action for unlawful interference with economic relations since the necessary elements of that tort were not pleaded, and that 244 has no basis for its claimed injunction since it pleaded no facts to satisfy all elements of the test in R. MacDonald v. Canada, 1994 CanLII 117 (SCC), [1994] 1 S.C.R. 311. I agree and so find. In addition, it argues that 244’s claim on its face discloses no reasonable basis for the punitive damages that it asserts. I agree and so find. The plaintiff refused to provide particulars on two bases – that the facts are within the defendant’s knowledge and that facts would only be provided to Collicutt after it made documentary production.