In these circumstances, the motion judge was fully justified in declining to confirm the assessment officer’s report and certificate, and in undertaking his own evaluation of the reasonableness of the solicitors’ bill of costs based on the factors outlined by this court in Cohen v. Kealey & Blaney, [1985] O.J. No. 160. While we might have approached certain of those factors in a manner that differs from the approach employed by the motion judge, we see no reversible error in his analysis or in his award of fees and disbursements to the solicitors.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.