Accordingly I find the imposition of the tax rates for Class Q as set out in Bylaw No. 279 and the 2017 Tax Billing Notice issue to Brinkworthy to be unreasonable and set aside the imposition of those rates on the basis that the tax rates set out in the bylaw do not meet the test of transparency and may well have been based on incorrect and improper assumptions. As stated by this court in Pucci v. North Vancouver (City), 2010 BCSC 743 at para 87:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.