The class definition must simply state objective criteria by which the class members can be identified: Western Canadian Shopping Centre v. Dutton, [2001] 2 S.C.R. 534, 2001 SCC 46 at ¶ 38. The requirement to show that the class is defined sufficiently narrowly is not an onerous one. Not everyone in the class has to share the same interest in the resolution of the common issue. However the class should not be unnecessarily broad: Hollick at ¶ 20 and 21.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.