On September 8, 2009, the citizenship judge refused the applicants citizenship application: Having reviewed all of the documentation submitted by the applicant, having personally interviewed her and for the reasons below, I am not satisfied, on a balance of probabilities that the information provided by the applicant accurately reflects the number of days that the applicant was, in fact, physically present in Canada. DECISION The applicant has the burden of establishing, on a balance of probabilities, that she satisfies the residency requirements pursuant to section 5(1)(c) of the Act refer to Mr. Justice de Montigny in Yu Ll v. MCI, T-1222-05, March 17, 2006 and Mr. Justice Gibson in his reasons for order in Maheswary Maharatnam 2000 03 28, T-668-99. On balance, all of the above does not satisfy me that the applicant meets the residency requirements under s.5(1)(c) of the Act. See Mr. Justice Muldoon in Re Pourghasemi. (Citizenship Record: Reasons, pp. 13-14). IV. Issue
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.