Further, we agree with the following comments of Baltman J. in Desjardins v. Bart, 2006 CanLII 33701 (ON S.C.) at para. 17: Although the normal practice, based on convenience, is to address child support going forward based on the previous year’s income, once the court is intervening and looking backwards at a particular period, it makes sense to adjust child support retroactively for the relevant period, which in this case is 2004.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.