[48] In joint-custody cases, the evidence should reveal what bonds the child has with each parent “and their ability to parent the child” and the “practical plan to care for the child the father [proposes] when he [has] the child with him and the benefits to the child of such an arrangement”: see Kaplanis v. Kaplanis, supra, at paragraph [10]. I expect that these particular principles are more apt when the court is considering an “equal sharing of the child” custody order (which is not the case here).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.