What is the test for accepting the late part of a complaint at the BC Human Rights Tribunal?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Iglesias v. Schneider Electric, 2010 BCHRT 221 (CanLII):

The onus is on the complainant to persuade the Tribunal both that it is in the public interest to accept the late-filed part of the complaint and that no substantial prejudice would result to any person in doing so: Chartier v. School District No. 62, 2003 BCHRT 39, para. 12.

Other Questions


In what circumstances will the Respondent at the Human Rights Tribunal of B.C. claim that the Applicant be denied the right to continue to pursue his human rights claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether the Human Rights Tribunal of BC has jurisdiction to hear a human rights complaint against the respondent? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the factors used by the BC Human Rights Tribunal to determine whether a complaint can be accepted outside of the 6-month time limit? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for accepting a late-filed complaint at the BC Human Rights Tribunal? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for accepting a complaint at the BC Human Rights Tribunal? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is it in the public interest for the BC Human Rights Tribunal to accept a late-filed complaint alleging discrimination on the basis of alcoholism and other addictions? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for accepting a late filed complaint at the BC Human Rights Tribunal? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the limitation of time for a complaint to be accepted by the BC Human Rights Tribunal? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the length of time taken by the BC Human Rights Tribunal to accept a complaint? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is it in the public interest to accept a late-filed human rights complaint? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.