What is the second step in the analysis of delay in determining whether it is excusable or excusable?
Saskatchewan, Canada
The following excerpt is from Saskatchewan Crop Insurance Corporation v McVeigh, 2017 SKQB 52 (CanLII):
Richards J.A. stated at para 44 of ICC: 44 The second step in the analysis, again as per Carey v. Twohig itself, is an examination of the reasons for the delay aimed at determining whether it is excusable. This inquiry will entail consideration of the nature of the claim, the diligence with which the claim has been pressed by the plaintiff, and the specific reasons offered as to why the matter has not moved more quickly. A wide variety of factors might be expected to factor into this assessment.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the second step in the analysis of delay in determining whether it is excusable? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a carrier is liable for delay and/or breach of contract for delay in delivering goods to a miller? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does a jury have any authority to determine whether a disease is hereditary? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a plaintiff failed to return to the west side of the road after colliding with another vehicle? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What are the relevant factors used by a judge to determine whether or not a child has been removed from the custody of his mother? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether an employer is liable for injuries sustained by a plaintiff in a motor vehicle accident? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether Petro Tag is a contributory factor in a Co-op’s loss of income? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is conduct of the parties a factor in determining whether or not a child has been found to be a contributing factor in a custody decision? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
In what circumstances will the court require that a document be submitted so that the contents of the document can be reviewed by the court to determine whether it is privileged? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How do courts determine whether a matter arises out of a collective agreement? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
