In Stanbridge v. Stanbridge [1998] B.C.J. No. 193 at paragraphs 36-39, Mr. Justice Clancy declined to take potential capital gains tax into account in allocating a family asset. Clancy J found the asset might not be sold to incur tax. Clancy J also found the evidence did not permit him to accurately calculate the tax payable on a possible future sale. For the same reasons I decline to take potential capital gains tax into account in this case.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.