Not every procedural deficiency will, however, require a new hearing. The production of evidence that could have changed the outcome of the hearing will assist in deciding whether the denial of procedural fairness in a given case was sufficiently serious as to require a new hearing: Lin v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) (1999), 1999 CanLII 8444 (FC), 171 F.T.R. 289 at para. 23, [1999] F.C.J. No. 1148.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.