In Samson Indian Nation and Band v. Canada, 1997 CanLII 6390 (FC), [1998] 3 F.C. 3, Teitelbaum J. was asked to recuse himself because of comments he had made on certain issues of law in two previous judgments. He said (at § 58): With due respect, I fail to see how what I said as to the interpretation of the law can give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. If this were the case I would never be permitted to sit on a case involving an issue about which I had previously decided. This, of course, would apply to every other judge in Canada who has made a decision on a particular issue.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.