What is the test for intervening in a personal injury matter?

Indeed, Courts can only intervene when a decision is patently unreasonable, when there is an error of law or where procedural requirements have not been respected; see Grygorian v. Canada [1996] F.C.A.D. 1486-01.

Furthermore, in the decision Vessaova v. Canada [1996] F.C.A.D. 1598-04, it was affirmed that "the Immigration and Refugee Board has full discretion with respect to the analysis of credibility of witnesses and claimants who appear before it". In that case it is further stated that a decision should not be "subject to microsopic examination nor should particular statements in the decision be subject to a semantic autopsy".