In Lanlehin v. Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration) (FCA), [1993] F.C.J. No. 207, Décary J.A. states: These questions were not, however, raised by the appellant in his memorandum, and it may be that, had the respondent known in time, she would have been able to explain the contradictions that are apparent on the record. At this point, we cannot assume that the decision is invalid and we are of the opinion, in the circumstances, that the appeal should be dismissed.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.