It was agreed by both parties that the standard of review in this appeal from a decision of the Prothonotary is that the decision should not be disturbed unless it is clearly wrong, in the sense that the exercise of discretion was based upon a wrong principle or upon a misapprehension of the facts. Canada v. Aqua-Jem Investments Limited (1993), 1993 CanLII 2939 (FCA), 149 N.R. 273 at 295 (F.C.A.) Are the orders under appeal clearly wrong in that they were based upon a wrong principle?
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.