This Court has the discretion to refuse to enforce a settlement agreement only in the following circumstances: there was a limitation on the instructions of counsel for the settling party known to the offering party; there was a misapprehension by counsel for the settling party of their instructions or there are facts which would make it unjust to enforce a settlement agreement; there is evidence of fraud or collusion; or, where there is an issue to be tried as to whether there is such a limitation, misapprehension, fraud or collusion in relation to the settlement agreement: Hawitt v. Campbell, [1983] CanLII 307 (B.C.C.A.) at para. 19.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.