The following excerpt is from Brooks v. Yates, 818 F.3d 532 (9th Cir. 2016):
"[G]ross negligence by counsel amounting to virtual abandonment can be an extraordinary circumstance that justifies [relief under] Rule 60(b)(6)." Mackey v. Hoffman, 682 F.3d 1247, 1251 (9th Cir.2012) (alteration omitted) (quoting Cmty. Dental Servs. v. Tani, 282 F.3d 1164, 116971 (9th Cir.2002) ). In such circumstances, "a petitioner may be excused from the consequences of his attorney's conduct where that conduct effectively severs the principal-agent relationship." Foley v. Biter, 793 F.3d 998, 1002 (9th Cir.2015).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.