Can an appellant cross-examine the deputy sheriff at a sheriff's hearing?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Rauda, 2d Crim. No. B258675 (Cal. App. 2015):
The trial court did not violate appellant's constitutional right to confront witnesses. Appellant had the opportunity to cross-examine the deputies at the section 1538.5 hearing. He could not relitigate the issue at trial. (People v. Memro, supra, 38 Cal.3d at p. 666, fn. 3.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is an appeal moot when, through no fault of the appellant, an event occurs which makes it impossible for the reviewing court to provide any effective relief to the appellant even when ruling in the appellant's favor? (California, United States of America)
Can a sheriff's deputy be held liable for the killing of a man who was shot and killed by a deputy during a traffic stop? (California, United States of America)
What evidence exists to support appellant's claim of self-defense in a case where appellant's father is accused of striking appellant's mother in the head with a baseball bat? (California, United States of America)
After reviewing the record of a motion brought by appellant in the Superior Court of Appeal against the appellant, what is the appellant's request for an independent review of the record? (California, United States of America)
Does appellant have to provide a satisfactory explanation from appellant's counsel for his conduct toward appellant? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will a deputy coroner testify in court about an autopsy report prepared by another deputy coroner? (California, United States of America)
Is a respondent's failure to address an argument raised by the appellant at the hearing a concession or forfeiture? (California, United States of America)
Is a respondent's failure to address an argument raised by the appellant at the hearing a concession or forfeiture? (California, United States of America)
If a defendant's request for reappointment of counsel for a preliminary hearing was rejected immediately before the preliminary hearing commenced, is such error harmless even under the beyond-the-reasonable doubt standard? (California, United States of America)
Does the Court of Appeal have found that Defendant Joiner did not waive his assumed constitutional right to be personally present at the remand hearing and that the court erred in conducting that hearing in his absence? (California, United States of America)
