California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Bristol Convalescent Hospital v. Stone, 258 Cal.App.2d 848, 66 Cal.Rptr. 404 (Cal. App. 1968):
Russell v. Ramm, supra, had to do with a claim that the filing of an amended complaint after trial, apparently to conform to proof, left plaintiff with a complaint that failed to state a cause of action because of omission from the amended complaint of an essential paragraph found in the original complaint the allegations of which had been proved at the contested trial.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.