The judge went on to quote with approval the following excerpt from Vertlieb Anderson v. Nelford,[1989] B.C.J. No. 2084: If a client chooses to leave with an associate, the associate is obviously taking a business advantage which belonged to the firm. However, as set out in Can. Aero, there is a way of taking a business advantage which breaches one’s fiduciary duty and a way that does not. The unique aspect of the associate’s simultaneous and overriding fiduciary duty to his client means that it is the client and not the firm who actually sanctions the taking of the business advantage.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.