California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Cramer v. Tyars, 151 Cal.Rptr. 653, 23 Cal.3d 131, 588 P.2d 793 (Cal. 1979):
Appellant now argues that he was incompetent to be a witness because of mental incapacity. His counsel, however, made no objection as to his competency as a witness at any time during the hearing and the objection must therefore be deemed waived. (People v. Berry (1968) 260 Cal.App.2d 649, 652-653, 67 Cal.Rptr. 312.) Nor do we find merit in appellant's claim that his speech handicap necessarily made him an incompetent witness. As previously noted, a ward attendant who was very familiar with appellant's speech served as an "interpreter" and there was no contention made at the hearing that this arrangement was unsatisfactory.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.