California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Highland Fifth-orange Partners, LLC v. Inland Fish & Game Conservation Ass'n, E049388, E050205, Super.Ct.No. CIVSS704342 (Cal. App. 2011):
Other courts have recognized in various contexts that a subsequent owner may indeed bring claims for continuing trespass or continuing nuisance. In CAMSI IV v. Hunter Technology Corp. (1991) 230 Cal.App.3d 1525, for example, the court stated that "for limitations purposes the harm implicit in a tortious injury to property is harm to the
Page 17
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.