The following excerpt is from Sutton 58 Assocs. LLC v. Pilevsky, 140 N.Y.S.3d 897, 164 N.E.3d 984, 36 N.Y.3d 297 (N.Y. 2020):
In Choy v. Redland Insurance Co., 103 Cal. App. 4th 789, 127 Cal.Rptr.2d 94 [2002], the plaintiff brought a state court action against an insurance company and associated defendants. The plaintiff alleged that the defendants encouraged the insured to petition for bankruptcy for the "real purpose" of "frustrat[ing]" the plaintiff's "ability to seek and obtain a judgment against [the insured]" in excess of defendant insurer's policy limit ( id. at 794, 127 Cal Rptr 2d 94 ). The claims were preempted because the "gist" of the plaintiff's complaint was the defendants' "misuse[ ][of] the bankruptcy process" and state court remedies cannot serve as a vehicle to "circumvent well established federal rules relating to redress" for such misuses ( id. at 802, 127 Cal Rptr 2d 94 ). Although bankruptcy law references state
[164 N.E.3d 1009]
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.