California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Rosser, A131162 (Cal. App. 2012):
On January 18, 2011, the trial court filed an order denying appellant's motion to suppress. The court's analysis was prefaced with this statement: "The sole issue in this case is whether a suspect's purse can be lawfully searched after the suspect has been arrested and secured in the rear of a patrol car? The simple answer to this question is 'yes.' " In its order, the court summarized the law governing "searches incident to arrest." It noted, among other things, that "[o]fficers who have made an arrest may, as a matter of routine, conduct a 'search incident to arrest'" and that, in so doing, they "are not required to prove the arrestee might have possessed a weapon or evidence." (Citing United States v. Robinson (1973) 414 U.S. 218, 235 (Robinson).)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.