The following excerpt is from Continental Vending Mach. Corp., In re, 543 F.2d 986 (2nd Cir. 1976):
3 Talcott does not seriously press its contention that allowances in reorganization proceedings may not properly be referred to a special master under Rule 53, F.R.Civ.P. This position is understandable, in view of its failure to object below and our approval of similar references in other cases, see CAB v. Carefree Travel, Inc., 513 F.2d 375 (2d Cir. 1975).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.