The following excerpt is from United States v. Mickens, 20-258 L, 20-462, 20-630 (2nd Cir. 2021):
It is commonplace that, in pursuing a prosecution, the Government may not "comment on the failure of the defendant to testify . . . or suggest that the defendant has any burden of proof or any obligation to adduce any evidence whatsoever." United States v. Fell, 531 F.3d 197, 221 (2d Cir. 2008). Still, "[a] prosecutor's commentary about a defendant's lack of evidence becomes prejudicial only if the jury would naturally and necessarily interpret the Government's summation as a comment on the defendant's failure to testify or if the evidence that the defendant has not produced was exclusively in his control." Daugerdas, 837 F.3d at 227.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.