Can a motion for a continuance be reviewed for abuse of discretion?

"'A continuance in a criminal trial may only be granted for good cause. [Citation.] "The trial court's denial of a motion for continuance is reviewed for abuse of discretion." [Citation.] "There are no mechanical tests for deciding when a denial of a continuance is so arbitrary as to violate due process. The answer must be found in the circumstances present in every case, particularly in the reasons presented to the trial judge at the time the request is denied." [Citations.]' (People v. Mungia (2008) 44 Cal.4th 1101, 1118.) 'The party challenging a ruling on a continuance bears the burden of establishing an abuse of discretion, and an order denying a continuance is seldom successfully attacked. [Citation.] [] Under this state law standard, discretion is abused only when the court exceeds the bounds of reason, all circumstances being considered. [Citations.]' (People v. Beames (2007) 40 Cal.4th 907, 920.)" (People v. Hajek (2014) 58 Cal.4th 1144, 1181.)

Page 53