California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Golden v. Conway, 128 Cal.Rptr. 69, 55 Cal.App.3d 948 (Cal. App. 1976):
In Fakhoury v. Magner, supra, the court followed the following rationale, 'We do not hold that under every possible set of circumstances the doctrine of strict liability will apply. As in the case of personal property which is leased, where no contemporaneous lease of real property is involved, there are limitations. The property must have been placed in the stream of commerce; a casual or isolated transaction will not bring the doctrine into play. In the case at hand, the landlord furnished two apartments in San Francisco and three in Sacramento at the same time with the same kind of couch purchased from the same seller. Moreover, the item was a substantial one, not an incidental bit of
Page 78
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.