Can a jury not convict an appellant of drug trafficking unless it found that appellant intended to transport drugs for sale?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Lopez, 2d Crim. No. B282387 (Cal. App. 2018):

Appellant argues that the trial court, in giving a standard CALCRIM No. 2300 instruction on transportation for sale, failed to instruct that the jury could not convict unless it found that appellant intended to transport drugs for sale. Appellant did not object to the CALCRIM No. 2300 instruction or request amplifying language, thereby waiving the error. (People v. Smithey (1999) 20 Cal.4th 936, 976, fn. 7; People v. Hart (1999) 20 Cal.4th 564, 622.)

Other Questions


What is the record of a convicted drug addict who was convicted of drug possession and being under the influence of drugs in the past? (California, United States of America)
What grounds of appeal have been appealed against the sentence of a convicted drug dealer convicted of possession of a drug with intent to commit a sexual assault? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General have the authority to stay the execution of a convicted drug offender who has two prior drug convictions? (California, United States of America)
Does a convicted felon who has completed his sentence for a conviction for a felonies conviction under Proposition 47 of the California Criminal Code, who would have been convicted of a misdemeanor under this act if this act had not been in effect? (California, United States of America)
What are the mitigating factors under section 1203.07 of the California Criminal Code for a drug dealer convicted of possession for sale or sale of heroin? (California, United States of America)
Does a mid term sentence need to be imposed on a convicted drug dealer who was convicted of a series of drug crimes because of premeditation? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will a jury consider whether a drug dealer's sales of illegal drugs were specifically intended to promote, further or assist criminal conduct by other gang members? (California, United States of America)
Does the fact that Weizoerick and Ahlo opined the drugs were possessed for sale rather than personal use, rather than possession, are sufficient evidence to convict a defendant of a drug offence? (California, United States of America)
What if a jury's unanimous agreement that the cocaine found in the black pouch or in the sewing machine was sufficient to convict appellant of possession of cocaine for sale? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General have the authority to amend the abstract of judgment of a criminal conviction to add the amount of laboratory and drug program fees that attach to the corporal injury conviction? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.