Can a judge correct a clerical error in an abstract of judgment?

Having undertaken an examination of the entire record pursuant to Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436 we find no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant. The abstract of judgment, however, contains clerical errors that must be corrected. (People v. Mitchell (2001) 26 Cal.4th 181, 185 ["Courts may correct clerical errors at any time, and appellate courts . . . that have properly assumed jurisdiction of cases have ordered correction of abstracts of judgment that did not accurately reflect the oral judgments of sentencing courts"].)