California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Stevens v. Superior Court, 52 Cal.App.4th 55, 60 Cal.Rptr.2d 397 (Cal. App. 1997):
The master calendar exception envisions that the parties' attorneys are personally before the court when the assignment is made. It requires the challenge be made immediately upon the assignment in order to permit the "judge in the master calendar department to make an immediate assignment to another department and immediately to utilize the challenged judge for some other pending case." (People v. Escobedo (1973) 35 Cal.App.3d 32, 38, 110 Cal.Rptr. 550.) However, when a master calendar department assigns a [52 Cal.App.4th 60] case to a trial department well in advance of the trial date, the rationale of the master calendar rule does not apply. (People v. Superior Court (Lavi), supra, 4 Cal.4th 1164, 1175-1176, 17 Cal.Rptr.2d 815, 847 P.2d 1031.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.