California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Estate of Schaad, E044022 (Cal. App. 12/12/2008), E044022 (Cal. App. 2008):
ERISA strives for nationally uniform plan administration; varying state automatic revocation laws defeat that purpose. (Egelhoff v. Egelhoff, supra, 532 U.S. 141, 148-149 [121 S.Ct. 1322, 1328, 149 L.Ed.2d 264, 272-273].) ERISA itself provides that the fiduciary should make benefit payments to the "beneficiary" who is "designated by a participant, or by the terms of [the] plan." (29 U.S.C. 1002(8).) Thus, the plan administrator should be able simply to look to the beneficiary designation made (if allowed by the plan) by the plan participant.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.