California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Wilkerson, A147172 (Cal. App. 2017):
On December 1, 2015, appellant made a motion to replace appointed counsel pursuant to People v. Marsden (1970) 2 Cal.3d 118 (Marsden). In an in camera hearing, appellant stated, inter alia, that he felt he was under duress when he entered his no contest pleas because trial counsel said he (appellant) was out of time and needed to make a decision. Appellant also cited authority permitting a defendant to withdraw his plea if he received ineffective assistance of counsel. Defense counsel responded that he had had multiple lengthy meetings with appellant to discuss his case and felt they had reached a productive meeting of the minds despite some difficult conversations. Appellant knew that the decision whether to accept the plea agreement was his to make and, although it was a difficult decision, counsel believed appellant made a wise choice in accepting the plea agreement and very significantly reducing his exposure to a lengthy prison sentence.
Page 4
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.