California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Tyrone M. (In re Tyrone M.), B242523 (Cal. App. 2013):
A trier of fact is permitted to infer that a defendant's flight immediately after the commission of a crime indicates a consciousness of guilt. (People v. Mendoza (2000) 24 Cal.4th 130, 180.) Although appellant's counsel presented a plausible explanation for appellant's flight, it was within the juvenile court's exclusive province to reject that explanation as inherently incredible in light of the evidence as a whole.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.