The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Chitty, 760 F.2d 425 (2nd Cir. 1985):
[U]nder Miranda v. Arizona, [384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966) ], we must conclude that, when faced while in custody with a court-ordered psychiatric inquiry, respondent's statements to [a psychiatrist] were not "given freely and voluntarily without any compelling influences" and, as such, could be used as the [Government] did at the penalty phase only if respondent had been apprised of his rights and had knowingly decided to waive them.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.