California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Williams v. Superior Court, 71 Cal.2d 1144, 80 Cal.Rptr. 747 (Cal. 1969):
The answer must be no; the mere fact of possession of recently stolen property does Not provide the basis for a reasonable inference either that the possessor was the one who stole the property or that the possessor knew that it had been stolen, and thus cannot be sufficient to support a conviction (e.g., People v. Wissenfeld, Supra, 36 Cal.2d 758, 763, 227 P.2d 833) Or to hold a defendant to answer.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.