The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Mir, 89 F.3d 847 (9th Cir. 1996):
Defendant argues for the first time on appeal that the dual sovereign exception to the double jeopardy clause does not apply because the forfeiture was in fact a federal forfeiture. "Issues not presented to the trial court cannot generally be raised for the first time on appeal." United States v. Flores-Payon, 942 F.2d 556, 558 (9th Cir.1991). However, we find it is appropriate to address defendant's argument because he raises a purely legal issue and the government has failed to establish prejudice. See id.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.