The following excerpt is from Ruvalcaba v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, Case No. 15-cv-744-BAS-DHB (S.D. Cal. 2016):
"While 'misleading' practices under 1692e and 'unfair' practices under 1692f reference separate categories of prohibited conduct, they are broad, potentially overlapping, and are not mutually exclusive. A debt collector's action could be 'misleading' under 1692e, 'unfair' under 1692f, or, as alleged here, both. The distinct characteristics of 1692e and 1692f can also confirm one another." Currier v. First Resolution Inv. Corp., 762 F.3d 529, 536 (6th Cir. 2014).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.