California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Caro v. Procter & Gamble Co., 18 Cal.App.4th 644, 22 Cal.Rptr.2d 419 (Cal. App. 1993):
Further, fashioning an effective remedy to distribute monetary compensation to the consumers affected poses a problem where, as here, such persons are potentially numerous and likely difficult to find because of inadequate records. The utility of class treatment declines when other effective and perhaps more efficient means exist to resolve the problem. "While termination of a defendant's alleged wrongdoing is a factor to be considered [citation], it does not warrant group action for damage when the [18 Cal.App.4th 661] members will not recover damage, and when a simpler remedy such as mandate is available." (Blue Chip Stamps v.
Page 428
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.