The following excerpt is from United States v. Soto-Barraza, 947 F.3d 1111 (9th Cir. 2017):
We disagree. A constructive amendment "occurs when the charging terms of the indictment are altered, either literally or in effect, by the prosecutor or a court after the grand jury has last passed upon them," United States v. Ward , 747 F.3d 1184, 1189 (9th Cir. 2014) (quoting United States v. Von Stoll , 726 F.2d 584, 586 (9th Cir. 1984) ), such as "where (1) there is a complex of facts [presented at trial] distinctly different from those set forth in the charging instrument, or (2) the crime charged [in the indictment] was substantially altered at trial, so that it was impossible to know whether the grand jury would have indicted for the crime actually proved."
[947 F.3d 1119]
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.