Can a bankruptcy court abuse its legal standard or its factual findings?
federal, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Boyle Ave. Props. v. New Meatco Provisions, LLC (In re New Meatco Provisions, LLC), BAP No. CC-13-1319-KiLaPa, Bk. No. 2:13-22155-PC (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 2014):
Cir. 1995). A bankruptcy court abuses its discretion if it applies an incorrect legal standard or its factual findings are illogical, implausible or without support from evidence in the record. TrafficSchool.com v. Edriver Inc., 653 F.3d 820, 832 (9th Cir. 2011).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Can a bankruptcy court abuse its discretion when it applies an incorrect legal standard or factual findings? (federal, United States of America)
If a court finds that a sanction imposed by a district court was an abuse of power, does the court have any authority to determine whether the sanction was abused or abused? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a bankruptcy court abuse its legal standard or its findings of fact? (federal, United States of America)
Can a bankruptcy court abuse its discretion when it applies incorrect legal rule or factual findings? (federal, United States of America)
If a court finds that a plaintiff has been denied a right to sue under a different legal standard than under the current standard of care, can the finding be reviewed? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the legal standard used by the courts to determine the correct legal standard? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the findings of a bankruptcy court's findings of fact and conclusions of law de novo? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a bankruptcy judge required to affirm the factual findings of the bankruptcy court? (federal, United States of America)
Can a district court's decision to deny leave to amend be reviewed under the abuse of the abuse standard? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the findings of a federal court's findings of fact and conclusions of law de novo? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
