The goods, therefore, in that case never passed to the vendee, and remained in the possession of a person who was in no way in privity with the vendee, but was, as this case puts it, a middleman between the vendor and purchaser. The case, therefore, may be looked upon as an authority for the decision in Burr v. Wilson, but does not warrant the conclusion arrived at in Howell v. Alport.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.