I accept that Buchar offers no explanation for limiting recovery to one-half of the net proceeds of sale and that, arguably, the court was holding the wife liable only for the husband’s one-half interest in the net proceeds of sale. Nonetheless, I do not accept the appellant’s argument that he ought not to be held liable for one-half of the net sale proceeds because he has paid his wife that amount. I reject that argument based on the wording of s. 12 of the Assignments and Preferences Act, and this court’s decision in Allen v. Hennessey.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.