Earlier in these reasons I mentioned the rule in Browne v. Dunn, and said that I would have more to say about it. The rule is one of fairness to the witness: a cross examiner cannot rely on evidence that is contradictory to the testimony of the witness without having first putting the evidence to the witness in order to allow the witness to explain the alleged contradiction. In this case, it is unfair not to ask the complainant whether he had been carrying a beer bottle, or whether he had thrown a beer bottle, only later to lead that evidence from the accused.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.