Does a defence lawyer have to cross-examine a witness in cross-examination?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from R. v. Caron, 2014 BCSC 242 (CanLII):

The rule in Browne v. Dunn presumes that a properly instructed lawyer would know what his client will say in court. If a defence lawyer knows that his client will testify and contradict a witness, then he must propose the contradictory evidence to the witness during cross-examination. A failure to cross-examine implies that the client's instructions did not include the contradictory information and throws doubt upon the accused person's credibility.

Other Questions


Can a lawyer who fails to put a proposition of evidence to a witness in cross-examination in a civil matter be held liable to sue the witness in a criminal case? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what cases have the courts restrained a lawyer from acting where the lawyer has previously acted jointly for another lawyer? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the defence have to be limited in its defence in the defence or preparation for trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the defence of a defence where the defence cannot raise a reasonable doubt by mere speculation? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a lawyer be found guilty of professional misconduct by misleading opposing counsel by including a witness he knew was dead in his list of witnesses? (British Columbia, Canada)
How has the law society of BC dealt with professional misconduct claims against a lawyer who incurred debts to another lawyer? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will a witness be required to fully disclose his or her personal information to a witness? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is confidentiality an obligation of a lawyer to keep confidential all communications between lawyers and clients confidential? (British Columbia, Canada)
If there is a contradiction between two statements made by the same witness at different times, can that contradiction affect the credibility of the witness? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is evidence of a statement made to a witness by a person who is not himself called as a witness admissible? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.