The rule in Browne v. Dunn presumes that a properly instructed lawyer would know what his client will say in court. If a defence lawyer knows that his client will testify and contradict a witness, then he must propose the contradictory evidence to the witness during cross-examination. A failure to cross-examine implies that the client's instructions did not include the contradictory information and throws doubt upon the accused person's credibility.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.