The Law Lords in Browne v. Dunn did not clearly identify a proposed remedy where there was a breach of the rule of practice. Some of the early jurisprudence suggested that counsel risked an adverse inference to their position should they fail to cross-examine. More recent jurisprudence has receded somewhat from that position leaving it to the discretion of the trial judge to determine what remedy ought to be applied.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.