British Columbia raises a preliminary issue. It says that in order to challenge the constitutionality of valid legislation, the rules on court fees in this case, the plaintiffs must identify which section of the Constitution or the Charter has allegedly been breached. The defendant says that the plaintiffs have failed to do so and general principles such as the rule of law do not constitute a stand-alone ground for invalidating otherwise legitimate legislation (British Columbia v. Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd., 2005 SCC 49 at para. 56-68).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.