Does a finding of negligence in a motor vehicle accident constitute battery alone?
Ontario, Canada
The following excerpt is from Hadley v. Allore, 1985 CanLII 3164 (ON SC):
The plaintiff argues that Boase v. Paul, supra, was decided on the basis of a finding of negligence, and does not cover a case where battery alone is alleged.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In a motor vehicle accident in this province, when is the discoverability rule applicable in motor vehicle accidents? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for pleading negligence in a motor vehicle accident? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the time for an action for damages from injuries suffered in a motor vehicle accident to be commenced within two years of the date of the accident? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for a plaintiff to bring a claim for negligence in a motor vehicle accident? (Ontario, Canada)
Does a manufacturer’s conduct in the course of business, in the context of an examination of a motor vehicle, constitute a duty of sale to the purchaser of the vehicle at the time of purchase? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether there is a claim against the owner or operator of the vehicle in a motor vehicle accident? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a motor vehicle accident is criminal negligence or dangerous driving? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there any case law where the defence called no evidence to support the presumption of negligence in a motor vehicle accident case? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for finding a plaintiff liable for injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a non-expert expert give evidence in a motor vehicle accident case that does not contradict the findings of an expert? (Ontario, Canada)
