There are many cases in which blanks in a contract have been filled in to give effect to the established intention of the parties and where the omission was due to an oversight, carelessness or neglect. In Bell v. Schultz (1912) 1912 CanLII 185 (SK QB), 2 WWR 491, 5 Sask LR 273, the vendor’s name was inserted in the appropriate blank spaces to effect the admitted intention of the parties. No third parties were involved in this action. The omission was an oversight.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.